CO129-430 - Others & Individuals - 1915 — Page 639

ata

car avg b

.Y900

.1400

The Under Secretary of

Home

office

bju „.00 2.8.2 s. R. & Co., Ltd.

WOOHOJ

ILONOON.)

.ONOMI .2.T

4

...8

staða 10 yIsforosƐ Tobaű adt ‚ I Lado 3 LưfW,so¿120 smok

?

+

*

TIG

„Juni d$95 eat to taštel zuoy bevissez svaĽ ON

॰ - Niusde sv Jædt sanidi stafë do yta‡oï008 „zát tand we ander o't tamils at exit galwollat edð dile egniized tolidest on avad alutno 17, indənadɑ, notm0,zno*prod

FANSHOIST A 4

+

.00 á azartsasora redunk

...að á Tæfell reban☎

160 & Faust

• Lady run síð

Misimit & nblað

•

...eð á Indiw gniti nov

boxioa ylist Jon #xA NOT

"

Taeqga biwow #1 an

10000 mi

•

NA PTURESİų stad ov NO CO FERN Š MIKLIDTko ons efvat sið IL 10 tazameni að svag un noitamkotni [[vì grov odd galingas Iqque

LÄSSHORT THRy to aư no kwĽdno sa preder MAILIIM

Kartka ord Jumin suð oð brager KIKW betobimpli zlevelsoðmi bm yiwole anieď oza osed?,gnofynol Fa vynalad Sand 10 fmarmored náð yf bataloqqa meerli doklynh yế te dua mitjanterice omon tøj of bespovasbro Kidnaidag ovací sv

XI109014 #1s gadi dolne ebony et uteges at erotablupil edi TWO TÍZ0401qmi syad yani dold to aboag of no bra and Ibrad 128 CJNG: SEC5 308.17 KOVOVOĽ BA ·Noiuueezog benims

2/10/1915

617

operating in the British Empire and under the supervision of

British Authorities, we take it that H.K.Secretary of State

does not really think, as you write, that we should have no

further dealings with these two establishments.

the

As regards the branches in the Treaty ports of Canton, Shanghai and Tientsin of Messrs. Reuter Brockelmann & Co.¡

branches in the same ports and in the captured port of Tsingtau

of Messrs.Bander Vieler & Co.; the sole establishment of Faust

& Co. in Tientsin: we have done no business with any of them

since April, as you will see from the enclosed table, and have of course not made any shipments to them (ex old contracts)

since the date specified in the Preclamation of the 24 th June.

We would mention however that the two firms, Reuter

Brockelmann & Co. and Bander Wieler & Co. are owing us sums of money amounting to £2,759.4.9. and £215.10.11. respectively

which we shall of course try to recover.

Von Daring Vibel & Co. of Pekin and Tientsin went under

a few years ago, and as for Wm. Keyerink & Co., these people

were so convulsed with rage in September 1914 on account of

the determined British attitude shown by our Mr.Banders in

letters (since printed for private circulation) that any

rapprochement with that firm was long since eliminated from

the bounds of possibility.

In conclusion we venture to say with great respect

that we regret that it should have been thought necessary to